Charleston Attack Preoccupies President Lincoln

April 13, 1863

President Lincoln is more “hopeful” regarding attack on Charleston, according to Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner with whom he meets.  Lincoln writes Admiral Samuel Du Pont: “Hold your position inside the bar near Charleston; or if you shall have left it, return to it, and hold it till further orders. Do not allow the enemy to erect new batteries or defences, on Morris-Island. If he has begun it, drive him out. I do not, herein, order you to renew the general attack. That is to depend on your own discretion, or a further order. A LINCOLN

Navy Secretary Gideon Welles records in his diary: “ Wrote Seward a letter on the subject of captured mails, growing out of the prize Peterhoff.  On the 18th of August last I prepared a set of instructions embracing the mails, on which Seward had unwittingly got committed.  The President requested that this should be done in conformity with certain arrangements which Seward had made with the foreign ministers.  I objected that the instructions which Mr. Seward had prepared in consultation with the foreigners were unjust to ourselves and contrary to usage and to law, but to get clear of the difficulty they were so far modified as to not directly violate the statutes, though there remained something invidious towards naval officers which I did not like.  The budget of concessions was, indeed, wholly against ourselves, and the covenants were made without any accurate knowledge on the part of the Secretary of State when they were given of what he was yielding.  But the whole, in the shape in which the instructions were finally put, passed off very well.  Ultimately these instructions by some instrumentality got into the papers, and the concessions were, even after they were cut down, so great that the Englishmen complimented the Secretary of State for liberal views.  The incense was so pleasant that Mr. Seward on the 30th of October wrote me a supercilious letter stating it was expedient our naval officers should forward the mails captured on blockade-runners, etc., to their destination as speedily as possible, without their being searched or opened.  The tone and manner of the letter were supercilious and offensive, the concession disreputable and unwarrantable, the surrender of indisputable rights disgraceful, and the whole thing unstatesmanslike and illegal, unjust to the Navy and the country, and discourteous to the Secretary of the Navy and the President, who had not been consulted.  I said to Mr. Seward at the time, last November, that the circular of the 18th of August had gone far enough, and was yielding more than was authorized, except by legislation or treaty.  He said his object was to keep the peace, to soothe and calm the English and French for a few weeks.”

Published in: on April 13, 2013 at 9:00 am  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: